NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring BING CLMB
Points 73.6 77.2
Total Points   150.8
Points From 2-Pointers 43.8 36.9
Points From 3-Pointers 17.7 25.4
Points From Free Throws 12.1 14.9
Shooting BING CLMB
Field Goals Made 27.8 26.9
Field Goals Attempted 57.4 58.1
Field Goal % 48.4% 46.3%
2 Pointers Made 21.9 18.4
2 Pointers Attempted 38.4 35.9
2 Point Shooting % 56.9% 51.3%
3 Pointers Made 5.9 8.5
3 Pointers Attempted 19.0 22.2
3 Point Shooting % 31.1% 38.2%
Free Throws Made 12.1 14.9
Free Throws Attempted 18.2 20.9
Free Throw % 66.4% 71.3%
Ball Control BING CLMB
Rebounds 35.2 32.1
Rebounds - Defensive 26.1 23.9
Rebounds - Offensive 9.1 8.2
Turnovers 11.2 8.9
Blocked Shots 4.3 3.2
Steals 4.1 6.5
Fouls 15.0 15.4

Playing Style Advantage: Binghamton

Expected Effect: +0.2 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats BING CLMB
Total Possessions 70.8
Effective Scoring Chances 68.6 70.1
% of Possessions with BING CLMB
2 Point Attempt 47.4% 44.5%
3 Point Attempt 23.4% 27.5%
Player Fouled 21.8% 21.2%
Turnover 15.9% 12.6%
Opponent Steal 9.2% 5.9%
Odds Per Shot Taken BING CLMB
Shot Blocked 5.6% 7.5%
Offensive Rebound 27.5% 23.8%