NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CIN TEM
Points 78.7 62.1
Total Points   140.8
Points From 2-Pointers 43.2 28.4
Points From 3-Pointers 22.5 20.9
Points From Free Throws 13.1 12.8
Shooting CIN TEM
Field Goals Made 29.1 21.1
Field Goals Attempted 61.5 60.1
Field Goal % 47.3% 35.2%
2 Pointers Made 21.6 14.2
2 Pointers Attempted 38.1 37.8
2 Point Shooting % 56.6% 37.6%
3 Pointers Made 7.5 7.0
3 Pointers Attempted 23.3 22.3
3 Point Shooting % 32.1% 31.2%
Free Throws Made 13.1 12.8
Free Throws Attempted 19.0 18.3
Free Throw % 68.9% 70.1%
Ball Control CIN TEM
Rebounds 45.9 31.2
Rebounds - Defensive 32.9 22.8
Rebounds - Offensive 13.0 8.4
Turnovers 10.2 9.3
Blocked Shots 5.3 2.4
Steals 5.3 6.3
Fouls 13.1 13.6

Playing Style Advantage: Temple

Expected Effect: +0.2 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CIN TEM
Total Possessions 71.0
Effective Scoring Chances 73.8 70.2
% of Possessions with CIN TEM
2 Point Attempt 44.9% 46.3%
3 Point Attempt 27.5% 27.4%
Player Fouled 19.1% 18.4%
Turnover 14.3% 13.0%
Opponent Steal 8.9% 7.4%
Odds Per Shot Taken CIN TEM
Shot Blocked 4.1% 8.7%
Offensive Rebound 36.3% 20.5%