NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring BING UNH
Points 74.3 74.9
Total Points   149.3
Points From 2-Pointers 46.0 33.1
Points From 3-Pointers 16.4 26.0
Points From Free Throws 11.9 15.8
Shooting BING UNH
Field Goals Made 28.5 25.2
Field Goals Attempted 58.9 59.5
Field Goal % 48.4% 42.4%
2 Pointers Made 23.0 16.6
2 Pointers Attempted 39.3 33.3
2 Point Shooting % 58.6% 49.7%
3 Pointers Made 5.5 8.7
3 Pointers Attempted 19.6 26.1
3 Point Shooting % 27.9% 33.1%
Free Throws Made 11.9 15.8
Free Throws Attempted 17.9 20.8
Free Throw % 66.4% 76.0%
Ball Control BING UNH
Rebounds 38.2 32.3
Rebounds - Defensive 29.7 25.4
Rebounds - Offensive 8.4 6.9
Turnovers 11.7 9.0
Blocked Shots 4.0 2.5
Steals 5.0 6.5
Fouls 15.9 14.2

Playing Style Advantage: Binghamton

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats BING UNH
Total Possessions 73.3
Effective Scoring Chances 70.0 71.3
% of Possessions with BING UNH
2 Point Attempt 47.5% 40.7%
3 Point Attempt 23.7% 31.9%
Player Fouled 19.4% 21.6%
Turnover 15.9% 12.2%
Opponent Steal 8.9% 6.8%
Odds Per Shot Taken BING UNH
Shot Blocked 4.2% 6.9%
Offensive Rebound 24.9% 18.9%