NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring COR BING
Points 84.0 70.5
Total Points   154.5
Points From 2-Pointers 39.3 38.9
Points From 3-Pointers 29.5 18.0
Points From Free Throws 15.3 13.6
Shooting COR BING
Field Goals Made 29.5 25.4
Field Goals Attempted 59.5 57.4
Field Goal % 49.5% 44.3%
2 Pointers Made 19.7 19.4
2 Pointers Attempted 31.2 37.5
2 Point Shooting % 62.9% 51.8%
3 Pointers Made 9.8 6.0
3 Pointers Attempted 28.3 19.9
3 Point Shooting % 34.7% 30.2%
Free Throws Made 15.3 13.6
Free Throws Attempted 20.6 20.5
Free Throw % 74.2% 66.4%
Ball Control COR BING
Rebounds 33.7 35.1
Rebounds - Defensive 25.6 24.9
Rebounds - Offensive 8.1 10.2
Turnovers 8.4 12.1
Blocked Shots 3.5 2.8
Steals 7.4 4.2
Fouls 16.7 15.6

Playing Style Advantage: Cornell

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats COR BING
Total Possessions 72.1
Effective Scoring Chances 71.7 70.2
% of Possessions with COR BING
2 Point Attempt 38.4% 44.8%
3 Point Attempt 34.8% 23.8%
Player Fouled 21.6% 23.2%
Turnover 11.7% 16.8%
Opponent Steal 5.8% 10.3%
Odds Per Shot Taken COR BING
Shot Blocked 5.0% 5.9%
Offensive Rebound 24.4% 28.5%