NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring LAM UTECH
Points 73.8 71.7
Total Points   145.5
Points From 2-Pointers 36.3 33.1
Points From 3-Pointers 20.2 22.1
Points From Free Throws 17.4 16.5
Shooting LAM UTECH
Field Goals Made 24.9 23.9
Field Goals Attempted 59.7 54.0
Field Goal % 41.7% 44.3%
2 Pointers Made 18.1 16.5
2 Pointers Attempted 39.2 31.8
2 Point Shooting % 46.2% 52.0%
3 Pointers Made 6.7 7.4
3 Pointers Attempted 20.4 22.2
3 Point Shooting % 33.0% 33.2%
Free Throws Made 17.4 16.5
Free Throws Attempted 24.1 26.1
Free Throw % 72.1% 63.3%
Ball Control LAM UTECH
Rebounds 36.7 37.4
Rebounds - Defensive 24.6 26.3
Rebounds - Offensive 12.2 11.1
Turnovers 11.9 15.0
Blocked Shots 3.7 3.3
Steals 7.8 5.9
Fouls 18.1 18.2

Playing Style Advantage: Lamar

Expected Effect: +0.5 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats LAM UTECH
Total Possessions 74.5
Effective Scoring Chances 74.8 70.6
% of Possessions with LAM UTECH
2 Point Attempt 44.6% 36.5%
3 Point Attempt 23.2% 25.5%
Player Fouled 24.5% 24.3%
Turnover 15.9% 20.1%
Opponent Steal 7.9% 10.5%
Odds Per Shot Taken LAM UTECH
Shot Blocked 6.3% 6.2%
Offensive Rebound 31.6% 31.0%