NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring RMU CLEVST
Points 70.0 75.8
Total Points   145.8
Points From 2-Pointers 33.3 44.3
Points From 3-Pointers 23.5 17.3
Points From Free Throws 13.1 14.3
Shooting RMU CLEVST
Field Goals Made 24.5 27.9
Field Goals Attempted 59.3 61.7
Field Goal % 41.3% 45.2%
2 Pointers Made 16.7 22.1
2 Pointers Attempted 33.1 43.9
2 Point Shooting % 50.3% 50.5%
3 Pointers Made 7.8 5.8
3 Pointers Attempted 26.2 17.9
3 Point Shooting % 30.0% 32.3%
Free Throws Made 13.1 14.3
Free Throws Attempted 18.8 21.7
Free Throw % 69.8% 65.8%
Ball Control RMU CLEVST
Rebounds 39.5 36.4
Rebounds - Defensive 26.1 24.3
Rebounds - Offensive 13.5 12.1
Turnovers 12.6 7.9
Blocked Shots 2.5 3.5
Steals 3.5 7.1
Fouls 14.9 14.0

Playing Style Advantage: Cleveland St

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats RMU CLEVST
Total Possessions 70.9
Effective Scoring Chances 71.7 75.1
% of Possessions with RMU CLEVST
2 Point Attempt 38.6% 52.2%
3 Point Attempt 30.5% 21.3%
Player Fouled 19.8% 21.0%
Turnover 17.8% 11.1%
Opponent Steal 10.1% 5.0%
Odds Per Shot Taken RMU CLEVST
Shot Blocked 5.7% 4.3%
Offensive Rebound 35.6% 31.6%