NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring WAKE CLEM
Points 71.9 74.1
Total Points   146.1
Points From 2-Pointers 32.7 37.4
Points From 3-Pointers 23.8 22.4
Points From Free Throws 15.5 14.2
Shooting WAKE CLEM
Field Goals Made 24.2 26.2
Field Goals Attempted 57.2 57.1
Field Goal % 42.4% 45.9%
2 Pointers Made 16.3 18.7
2 Pointers Attempted 33.7 35.1
2 Point Shooting % 48.5% 53.3%
3 Pointers Made 7.9 7.5
3 Pointers Attempted 23.5 21.9
3 Point Shooting % 33.7% 34.1%
Free Throws Made 15.5 14.2
Free Throws Attempted 19.6 18.3
Free Throw % 79.2% 77.8%
Ball Control WAKE CLEM
Rebounds 33.0 35.0
Rebounds - Defensive 25.8 27.8
Rebounds - Offensive 7.2 7.3
Turnovers 8.5 9.1
Blocked Shots 2.6 3.2
Steals 5.1 4.1
Fouls 14.1 15.8

Playing Style Advantage: Clemson

Expected Effect: +0.2 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats WAKE CLEM
Total Possessions 69.9
Effective Scoring Chances 68.6 68.0
% of Possessions with WAKE CLEM
2 Point Attempt 43.0% 44.9%
3 Point Attempt 30.0% 28.1%
Player Fouled 22.6% 20.2%
Turnover 12.1% 13.1%
Opponent Steal 5.9% 7.2%
Odds Per Shot Taken WAKE CLEM
Shot Blocked 5.7% 4.6%
Offensive Rebound 20.5% 22.0%