NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring L-MD BING
Points 65.7 73.1
Total Points   138.8
Points From 2-Pointers 32.5 43.4
Points From 3-Pointers 20.7 16.4
Points From Free Throws 12.5 13.3
Shooting L-MD BING
Field Goals Made 23.2 27.1
Field Goals Attempted 56.5 52.9
Field Goal % 41.0% 51.3%
2 Pointers Made 16.3 21.7
2 Pointers Attempted 35.8 36.3
2 Point Shooting % 45.5% 59.8%
3 Pointers Made 6.9 5.5
3 Pointers Attempted 20.8 16.6
3 Point Shooting % 33.2% 32.8%
Free Throws Made 12.5 13.3
Free Throws Attempted 19.5 20.1
Free Throw % 64.1% 66.4%
Ball Control L-MD BING
Rebounds 32.2 34.6
Rebounds - Defensive 23.0 27.9
Rebounds - Offensive 9.2 6.7
Turnovers 9.4 10.0
Blocked Shots 2.4 3.6
Steals 5.8 4.5
Fouls 15.8 15.2

Playing Style Advantage: Binghamton

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats L-MD BING
Total Possessions 68.3
Effective Scoring Chances 68.1 65.0
% of Possessions with L-MD BING
2 Point Attempt 45.3% 47.7%
3 Point Attempt 26.3% 21.9%
Player Fouled 22.3% 23.1%
Turnover 13.7% 14.6%
Opponent Steal 6.6% 8.5%
Odds Per Shot Taken L-MD BING
Shot Blocked 6.9% 4.4%
Offensive Rebound 24.8% 22.5%