NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring RAD VT
Points 65.7 79.6
Total Points   145.3
Points From 2-Pointers 37.2 38.6
Points From 3-Pointers 18.2 26.0
Points From Free Throws 10.3 14.9
Shooting RAD VT
Field Goals Made 24.7 28.0
Field Goals Attempted 57.6 57.4
Field Goal % 42.9% 48.8%
2 Pointers Made 18.6 19.3
2 Pointers Attempted 39.5 32.1
2 Point Shooting % 47.2% 60.2%
3 Pointers Made 6.1 8.7
3 Pointers Attempted 18.1 25.3
3 Point Shooting % 33.5% 34.2%
Free Throws Made 10.3 14.9
Free Throws Attempted 13.9 18.7
Free Throw % 73.7% 79.8%
Ball Control RAD VT
Rebounds 31.5 34.7
Rebounds - Defensive 22.3 25.6
Rebounds - Offensive 9.2 9.1
Turnovers 10.2 8.0
Blocked Shots 2.6 2.4
Steals 4.5 4.1
Fouls 15.4 11.9

Playing Style Advantage: Radford

Expected Effect: +0.3 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats RAD VT
Total Possessions 67.5
Effective Scoring Chances 66.5 68.7
% of Possessions with RAD VT
2 Point Attempt 50.8% 41.3%
3 Point Attempt 23.3% 32.6%
Player Fouled 17.7% 22.9%
Turnover 15.2% 11.8%
Opponent Steal 6.1% 6.6%
Odds Per Shot Taken RAD VT
Shot Blocked 4.2% 4.6%
Offensive Rebound 26.4% 29.0%