NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring RAD ECU
Points 68.8 71.6
Total Points   140.5
Points From 2-Pointers 34.6 37.1
Points From 3-Pointers 23.6 21.4
Points From Free Throws 10.7 13.2
Shooting RAD ECU
Field Goals Made 25.2 25.7
Field Goals Attempted 56.9 59.8
Field Goal % 44.2% 42.9%
2 Pointers Made 17.3 18.5
2 Pointers Attempted 34.1 36.6
2 Point Shooting % 50.7% 50.7%
3 Pointers Made 7.9 7.1
3 Pointers Attempted 22.8 23.2
3 Point Shooting % 34.6% 30.7%
Free Throws Made 10.7 13.2
Free Throws Attempted 14.4 19.2
Free Throw % 73.7% 68.6%
Ball Control RAD ECU
Rebounds 34.5 36.6
Rebounds - Defensive 24.1 23.3
Rebounds - Offensive 10.4 13.2
Turnovers 10.6 8.0
Blocked Shots 3.1 2.7
Steals 4.2 5.5
Fouls 13.7 11.9

Playing Style Advantage: Radford

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats RAD ECU
Total Possessions 66.4
Effective Scoring Chances 66.2 71.7
% of Possessions with RAD ECU
2 Point Attempt 43.8% 45.2%
3 Point Attempt 29.2% 28.7%
Player Fouled 17.9% 20.7%
Turnover 15.9% 12.0%
Opponent Steal 8.3% 6.3%
Odds Per Shot Taken RAD ECU
Shot Blocked 4.6% 5.6%
Offensive Rebound 30.8% 35.5%