NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring RAD SCUS
Points 73.0 67.9
Total Points   140.9
Points From 2-Pointers 38.6 34.2
Points From 3-Pointers 19.6 23.5
Points From Free Throws 14.9 10.2
Shooting RAD SCUS
Field Goals Made 25.8 25.0
Field Goals Attempted 56.9 58.3
Field Goal % 45.4% 42.8%
2 Pointers Made 19.3 17.1
2 Pointers Attempted 37.9 33.2
2 Point Shooting % 50.9% 51.5%
3 Pointers Made 6.5 7.8
3 Pointers Attempted 19.0 25.1
3 Point Shooting % 34.4% 31.2%
Free Throws Made 14.9 10.2
Free Throws Attempted 20.1 15.9
Free Throw % 73.7% 64.0%
Ball Control RAD SCUS
Rebounds 39.3 31.0
Rebounds - Defensive 27.4 22.0
Rebounds - Offensive 11.9 9.0
Turnovers 10.4 9.3
Blocked Shots 3.4 2.9
Steals 4.8 4.7
Fouls 14.4 14.5

Playing Style Advantage: Radford

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats RAD SCUS
Total Possessions 68.1
Effective Scoring Chances 69.7 67.8
% of Possessions with RAD SCUS
2 Point Attempt 46.7% 42.4%
3 Point Attempt 23.4% 31.9%
Player Fouled 21.2% 21.1%
Turnover 15.2% 13.6%
Opponent Steal 7.0% 7.1%
Odds Per Shot Taken RAD SCUS
Shot Blocked 5.1% 6.1%
Offensive Rebound 35.1% 24.8%