NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CLMB FOR
Points 69.6 76.5
Total Points   146.0
Points From 2-Pointers 33.2 37.3
Points From 3-Pointers 20.1 26.0
Points From Free Throws 16.3 13.2
Shooting CLMB FOR
Field Goals Made 23.3 27.3
Field Goals Attempted 52.9 61.8
Field Goal % 44.0% 44.2%
2 Pointers Made 16.6 18.7
2 Pointers Attempted 35.7 34.9
2 Point Shooting % 46.4% 53.4%
3 Pointers Made 6.7 8.7
3 Pointers Attempted 17.2 26.8
3 Point Shooting % 39.0% 32.3%
Free Throws Made 16.3 13.2
Free Throws Attempted 22.9 19.6
Free Throw % 71.3% 67.2%
Ball Control CLMB FOR
Rebounds 32.7 38.2
Rebounds - Defensive 25.2 25.2
Rebounds - Offensive 7.5 13.0
Turnovers 13.8 10.4
Blocked Shots 2.2 7.2
Steals 5.7 7.5
Fouls 15.4 17.0

Playing Style Advantage: Fordham

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CLMB FOR
Total Possessions 72.0
Effective Scoring Chances 65.7 74.6
% of Possessions with CLMB FOR
2 Point Attempt 43.4% 40.7%
3 Point Attempt 20.9% 31.2%
Player Fouled 23.6% 21.3%
Turnover 19.2% 14.5%
Opponent Steal 10.4% 7.9%
Odds Per Shot Taken CLMB FOR
Shot Blocked 11.7% 4.2%
Offensive Rebound 22.9% 34.0%