NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring SYR CLEM
Points 70.5 79.7
Total Points   150.1
Points From 2-Pointers 34.4 41.2
Points From 3-Pointers 21.0 26.1
Points From Free Throws 15.1 12.4
Shooting SYR CLEM
Field Goals Made 24.2 29.3
Field Goals Attempted 57.8 60.0
Field Goal % 41.8% 48.8%
2 Pointers Made 17.2 20.6
2 Pointers Attempted 36.8 36.7
2 Point Shooting % 46.8% 56.1%
3 Pointers Made 7.0 8.7
3 Pointers Attempted 21.0 23.3
3 Point Shooting % 33.3% 37.4%
Free Throws Made 15.1 12.4
Free Throws Attempted 20.8 15.9
Free Throw % 72.8% 77.8%
Ball Control SYR CLEM
Rebounds 30.0 39.2
Rebounds - Defensive 23.1 29.7
Rebounds - Offensive 6.9 9.5
Turnovers 8.8 11.2
Blocked Shots 2.5 3.1
Steals 7.4 4.3
Fouls 13.2 14.5

Playing Style Advantage: Clemson

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats SYR CLEM
Total Possessions 71.8
Effective Scoring Chances 69.9 70.1
% of Possessions with SYR CLEM
2 Point Attempt 46.0% 44.6%
3 Point Attempt 26.3% 28.3%
Player Fouled 20.2% 18.5%
Turnover 12.3% 15.5%
Opponent Steal 6.0% 10.2%
Odds Per Shot Taken SYR CLEM
Shot Blocked 5.2% 4.3%
Offensive Rebound 18.9% 29.1%