NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring FUR ETSU
Points 74.5 73.6
Total Points   148.1
Points From 2-Pointers 31.9 39.0
Points From 3-Pointers 26.7 21.5
Points From Free Throws 16.0 13.1
Shooting FUR ETSU
Field Goals Made 24.8 26.6
Field Goals Attempted 58.6 61.2
Field Goal % 42.4% 43.6%
2 Pointers Made 15.9 19.5
2 Pointers Attempted 30.6 38.5
2 Point Shooting % 52.1% 50.6%
3 Pointers Made 8.9 7.2
3 Pointers Attempted 28.1 22.6
3 Point Shooting % 31.7% 31.6%
Free Throws Made 16.0 13.1
Free Throws Attempted 22.0 19.9
Free Throw % 72.6% 66.1%
Ball Control FUR ETSU
Rebounds 35.7 39.3
Rebounds - Defensive 25.7 26.6
Rebounds - Offensive 10.0 12.7
Turnovers 10.8 10.7
Blocked Shots 2.6 5.8
Steals 6.3 6.6
Fouls 13.9 15.7

Playing Style Advantage: E Tenn St

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats FUR ETSU
Total Possessions 72.0
Effective Scoring Chances 71.3 74.0
% of Possessions with FUR ETSU
2 Point Attempt 36.3% 45.0%
3 Point Attempt 33.3% 26.4%
Player Fouled 21.8% 19.3%
Turnover 15.0% 14.8%
Opponent Steal 9.2% 8.7%
Odds Per Shot Taken FUR ETSU
Shot Blocked 9.6% 4.6%
Offensive Rebound 27.4% 33.0%