NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring COLG BING
Points 71.7 62.7
Total Points   134.5
Points From 2-Pointers 38.5 36.3
Points From 3-Pointers 20.7 15.9
Points From Free Throws 12.5 10.5
Shooting COLG BING
Field Goals Made 26.2 23.5
Field Goals Attempted 56.6 56.9
Field Goal % 46.2% 41.2%
2 Pointers Made 19.3 18.2
2 Pointers Attempted 36.2 37.8
2 Point Shooting % 53.2% 48.0%
3 Pointers Made 6.9 5.3
3 Pointers Attempted 20.4 19.1
3 Point Shooting % 33.8% 27.8%
Free Throws Made 12.5 10.5
Free Throws Attempted 18.8 15.7
Free Throw % 66.6% 66.4%
Ball Control COLG BING
Rebounds 35.1 34.9
Rebounds - Defensive 27.6 26.5
Rebounds - Offensive 7.4 8.4
Turnovers 7.8 10.3
Blocked Shots 4.4 2.7
Steals 6.0 3.8
Fouls 12.7 13.7

Playing Style Advantage: Binghamton

Expected Effect: +0.2 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats COLG BING
Total Possessions 68.0
Effective Scoring Chances 67.7 66.1
% of Possessions with COLG BING
2 Point Attempt 47.3% 48.4%
3 Point Attempt 26.7% 24.5%
Player Fouled 20.1% 18.6%
Turnover 11.4% 15.1%
Opponent Steal 5.5% 8.8%
Odds Per Shot Taken COLG BING
Shot Blocked 4.9% 7.9%
Offensive Rebound 21.9% 23.2%