NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring SEMO TNTC
Points 67.1 69.1
Total Points   136.2
Points From 2-Pointers 39.9 41.1
Points From 3-Pointers 18.2 14.1
Points From Free Throws 8.9 13.9
Shooting SEMO TNTC
Field Goals Made 26.0 25.2
Field Goals Attempted 60.6 52.2
Field Goal % 43.0% 48.4%
2 Pointers Made 20.0 20.5
2 Pointers Attempted 40.5 37.0
2 Point Shooting % 49.3% 55.5%
3 Pointers Made 6.1 4.7
3 Pointers Attempted 20.1 15.1
3 Point Shooting % 30.2% 31.1%
Free Throws Made 8.9 13.9
Free Throws Attempted 12.6 20.1
Free Throw % 70.6% 69.5%
Ball Control SEMO TNTC
Rebounds 33.3 33.6
Rebounds - Defensive 24.7 27.9
Rebounds - Offensive 8.7 5.7
Turnovers 9.9 11.4
Blocked Shots 2.6 2.3
Steals 5.4 4.8
Fouls 16.8 12.3

Playing Style Advantage: TN Tech

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats SEMO TNTC
Total Possessions 69.8
Effective Scoring Chances 68.6 64.2
% of Possessions with SEMO TNTC
2 Point Attempt 51.1% 48.3%
3 Point Attempt 25.3% 19.8%
Player Fouled 17.6% 24.1%
Turnover 14.2% 16.3%
Opponent Steal 6.9% 7.8%
Odds Per Shot Taken SEMO TNTC
Shot Blocked 4.5% 4.4%
Offensive Rebound 23.8% 18.9%