NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring WOF CHAT
Points 74.3 78.1
Total Points   152.4
Points From 2-Pointers 29.9 27.9
Points From 3-Pointers 34.8 35.8
Points From Free Throws 9.6 14.4
Shooting WOF CHAT
Field Goals Made 26.6 25.9
Field Goals Attempted 62.7 57.5
Field Goal % 42.4% 45.1%
2 Pointers Made 15.0 14.0
2 Pointers Attempted 30.6 25.8
2 Point Shooting % 48.9% 54.2%
3 Pointers Made 11.6 11.9
3 Pointers Attempted 32.1 31.7
3 Point Shooting % 36.2% 37.7%
Free Throws Made 9.6 14.4
Free Throws Attempted 15.4 19.1
Free Throw % 61.9% 75.3%
Ball Control WOF CHAT
Rebounds 37.2 36.4
Rebounds - Defensive 25.9 28.1
Rebounds - Offensive 11.3 8.3
Turnovers 8.5 8.7
Blocked Shots 2.5 2.7
Steals 4.2 5.3
Fouls 14.4 13.7

Playing Style Advantage: Wofford

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats WOF CHAT
Total Possessions 69.5
Effective Scoring Chances 72.3 69.0
% of Possessions with WOF CHAT
2 Point Attempt 37.4% 32.7%
3 Point Attempt 39.2% 40.3%
Player Fouled 19.8% 20.7%
Turnover 12.2% 12.6%
Opponent Steal 7.6% 6.0%
Odds Per Shot Taken WOF CHAT
Shot Blocked 4.8% 4.0%
Offensive Rebound 28.6% 24.2%