NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CLEM SYR
Points 79.1 69.9
Total Points   149.0
Points From 2-Pointers 40.4 34.1
Points From 3-Pointers 26.0 20.8
Points From Free Throws 12.7 15.0
Shooting CLEM SYR
Field Goals Made 28.9 24.0
Field Goals Attempted 59.6 57.5
Field Goal % 48.4% 41.7%
2 Pointers Made 20.2 17.1
2 Pointers Attempted 36.5 36.8
2 Point Shooting % 55.4% 46.3%
3 Pointers Made 8.7 6.9
3 Pointers Attempted 23.1 20.7
3 Point Shooting % 37.5% 33.5%
Free Throws Made 12.7 15.0
Free Throws Attempted 16.0 20.6
Free Throw % 79.5% 72.8%
Ball Control CLEM SYR
Rebounds 39.4 29.7
Rebounds - Defensive 29.9 23.0
Rebounds - Offensive 9.5 6.6
Turnovers 11.2 8.8
Blocked Shots 3.1 2.3
Steals 4.3 7.4
Fouls 14.4 13.2

Playing Style Advantage: Clemson

Expected Effect: +0.3 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CLEM SYR
Total Possessions 71.6
Effective Scoring Chances 69.8 69.5
% of Possessions with CLEM SYR
2 Point Attempt 44.5% 46.3%
3 Point Attempt 28.2% 26.0%
Player Fouled 18.5% 20.2%
Turnover 15.7% 12.2%
Opponent Steal 10.4% 6.0%
Odds Per Shot Taken CLEM SYR
Shot Blocked 4.0% 5.3%
Offensive Rebound 29.1% 18.2%