NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CLEM GT
Points 77.3 67.9
Total Points   145.2
Points From 2-Pointers 36.8 29.2
Points From 3-Pointers 25.4 25.9
Points From Free Throws 15.0 12.9
Shooting CLEM GT
Field Goals Made 26.9 23.2
Field Goals Attempted 60.7 60.3
Field Goal % 44.3% 38.5%
2 Pointers Made 18.4 14.6
2 Pointers Attempted 35.2 32.9
2 Point Shooting % 52.3% 44.4%
3 Pointers Made 8.5 8.6
3 Pointers Attempted 25.5 27.4
3 Point Shooting % 33.3% 31.4%
Free Throws Made 15.0 12.9
Free Throws Attempted 19.3 17.5
Free Throw % 77.8% 73.6%
Ball Control CLEM GT
Rebounds 38.3 37.3
Rebounds - Defensive 29.4 27.3
Rebounds - Offensive 8.9 10.0
Turnovers 6.8 9.1
Blocked Shots 3.0 2.5
Steals 4.5 3.6
Fouls 13.6 14.0

Playing Style Advantage: GA Tech

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CLEM GT
Total Possessions 70.1
Effective Scoring Chances 72.2 71.0
% of Possessions with CLEM GT
2 Point Attempt 44.1% 40.5%
3 Point Attempt 31.9% 33.7%
Player Fouled 19.9% 19.4%
Turnover 9.7% 13.0%
Opponent Steal 5.2% 6.5%
Odds Per Shot Taken CLEM GT
Shot Blocked 4.1% 5.1%
Offensive Rebound 24.5% 25.4%