NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring DETU CLEVST
Points 61.5 74.4
Total Points   135.9
Points From 2-Pointers 31.4 37.1
Points From 3-Pointers 15.8 21.0
Points From Free Throws 14.3 16.3
Shooting DETU CLEVST
Field Goals Made 21.0 25.6
Field Goals Attempted 54.7 57.4
Field Goal % 38.3% 44.5%
2 Pointers Made 15.7 18.6
2 Pointers Attempted 38.3 35.4
2 Point Shooting % 41.0% 52.5%
3 Pointers Made 5.3 7.0
3 Pointers Attempted 16.4 22.1
3 Point Shooting % 32.1% 31.7%
Free Throws Made 14.3 16.3
Free Throws Attempted 19.5 22.4
Free Throw % 73.6% 72.7%
Ball Control DETU CLEVST
Rebounds 35.5 35.9
Rebounds - Defensive 23.4 23.9
Rebounds - Offensive 12.2 12.0
Turnovers 14.1 9.5
Blocked Shots 2.5 5.4
Steals 5.2 8.1
Fouls 15.2 15.0

Playing Style Advantage: Cleveland St

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats DETU CLEVST
Total Possessions 69.0
Effective Scoring Chances 67.1 71.5
% of Possessions with DETU CLEVST
2 Point Attempt 46.0% 43.1%
3 Point Attempt 19.7% 26.9%
Player Fouled 21.7% 22.1%
Turnover 20.4% 13.7%
Opponent Steal 11.7% 7.5%
Odds Per Shot Taken DETU CLEVST
Shot Blocked 9.5% 4.7%
Offensive Rebound 33.7% 33.9%