NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring UTA BK
Points 115.2 117.5
Total Points   232.7
Points From 2-Pointers 57.6 55.5
Points From 3-Pointers 38.6 45.5
Points From Free Throws 18.9 16.6
Shooting UTA BK
Field Goals Made 41.7 42.9
Field Goals Attempted 88.9 91.7
Field Goal % 46.9% 46.8%
2 Pointers Made 28.8 27.8
2 Pointers Attempted 53.1 52.6
2 Point Shooting % 54.2% 52.8%
3 Pointers Made 12.9 15.2
3 Pointers Attempted 35.8 39.1
3 Point Shooting % 36.0% 38.7%
Free Throws Made 18.9 16.6
Free Throws Attempted 22.6 21.8
Free Throw % 83.7% 76.0%
Ball Control UTA BK
Rebounds 51.3 48.4
Rebounds - Defensive 37.9 35.0
Rebounds - Offensive 13.4 13.3
Turnovers 13.1 10.6
Blocked Shots 5.2 6.5
Steals 5.2 6.9
Fouls 16.2 16.8

Playing Style Advantage: Brooklyn

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats UTA BK
Total Possessions 101.5
Effective Scoring Chances 101.8 104.2
% of Possessions with UTA BK
2 Point Attempt 45.2% 45.0%
3 Point Attempt 30.4% 33.5%
Player Fouled 16.6% 16.0%
Turnover 12.9% 10.5%
Opponent Steal 6.8% 5.2%
Odds Per Shot Taken UTA BK
Shot Blocked 7.2% 6.0%
Offensive Rebound 27.7% 26.0%