NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring UTA GS
Points 116.7 125.9
Total Points   242.6
Points From 2-Pointers 56.6 59.7
Points From 3-Pointers 40.6 50.5
Points From Free Throws 19.4 15.7
Shooting UTA GS
Field Goals Made 41.9 46.7
Field Goals Attempted 90.7 94.0
Field Goal % 46.2% 49.6%
2 Pointers Made 28.3 29.9
2 Pointers Attempted 52.4 53.2
2 Point Shooting % 54.0% 56.1%
3 Pointers Made 13.5 16.8
3 Pointers Attempted 38.2 40.8
3 Point Shooting % 35.4% 41.2%
Free Throws Made 19.4 15.7
Free Throws Attempted 23.2 20.2
Free Throw % 83.7% 77.7%
Ball Control UTA GS
Rebounds 49.4 50.1
Rebounds - Defensive 35.4 36.1
Rebounds - Offensive 14.0 14.0
Turnovers 13.1 11.4
Blocked Shots 5.2 6.1
Steals 5.8 7.0
Fouls 15.4 17.2

Playing Style Advantage: Utah

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats UTA GS
Total Possessions 103.2
Effective Scoring Chances 104.1 105.8
% of Possessions with UTA GS
2 Point Attempt 43.8% 44.6%
3 Point Attempt 31.9% 34.2%
Player Fouled 16.7% 14.9%
Turnover 12.7% 11.0%
Opponent Steal 6.8% 5.6%
Odds Per Shot Taken UTA GS
Shot Blocked 6.6% 5.8%
Offensive Rebound 28.0% 28.3%