NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring GS UTA
Points 126.1 116.9
Total Points   243.0
Points From 2-Pointers 59.8 56.7
Points From 3-Pointers 50.6 40.7
Points From Free Throws 15.7 19.4
Shooting GS UTA
Field Goals Made 46.8 41.9
Field Goals Attempted 94.2 90.8
Field Goal % 49.7% 46.2%
2 Pointers Made 29.9 28.4
2 Pointers Attempted 53.3 52.5
2 Point Shooting % 56.1% 54.1%
3 Pointers Made 16.9 13.6
3 Pointers Attempted 40.9 38.3
3 Point Shooting % 41.2% 35.4%
Free Throws Made 15.7 19.4
Free Throws Attempted 20.2 23.2
Free Throw % 77.7% 83.7%
Ball Control GS UTA
Rebounds 50.2 49.4
Rebounds - Defensive 36.2 35.4
Rebounds - Offensive 14.0 14.0
Turnovers 11.4 13.1
Blocked Shots 6.1 5.2
Steals 7.0 5.8
Fouls 17.2 15.4

Playing Style Advantage: Utah

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats GS UTA
Total Possessions 103.3
Effective Scoring Chances 105.9 104.2
% of Possessions with GS UTA
2 Point Attempt 44.6% 43.8%
3 Point Attempt 34.3% 32.0%
Player Fouled 14.9% 16.6%
Turnover 11.0% 12.7%
Opponent Steal 5.6% 6.8%
Odds Per Shot Taken GS UTA
Shot Blocked 5.8% 6.6%
Offensive Rebound 28.3% 28.0%