NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring COR SYR
Points 78.2 81.4
Total Points   159.6
Points From 2-Pointers 37.3 42.3
Points From 3-Pointers 30.7 22.4
Points From Free Throws 10.1 16.6
Shooting COR SYR
Field Goals Made 28.9 28.6
Field Goals Attempted 60.3 58.3
Field Goal % 47.9% 49.1%
2 Pointers Made 18.7 21.2
2 Pointers Attempted 30.9 37.8
2 Point Shooting % 60.3% 55.9%
3 Pointers Made 10.2 7.5
3 Pointers Attempted 29.3 20.5
3 Point Shooting % 34.9% 36.5%
Free Throws Made 10.1 16.6
Free Throws Attempted 13.7 22.9
Free Throw % 74.2% 72.8%
Ball Control COR SYR
Rebounds 34.0 32.4
Rebounds - Defensive 24.5 23.6
Rebounds - Offensive 9.4 8.8
Turnovers 14.3 10.3
Blocked Shots 2.0 3.6
Steals 6.6 8.9
Fouls 16.5 12.8

Playing Style Advantage: Cornell

Expected Effect: +0.3 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats COR SYR
Total Possessions 74.0
Effective Scoring Chances 69.1 72.5
% of Possessions with COR SYR
2 Point Attempt 36.5% 45.3%
3 Point Attempt 34.6% 24.5%
Player Fouled 17.3% 22.3%
Turnover 19.4% 14.0%
Opponent Steal 12.0% 8.9%
Odds Per Shot Taken COR SYR
Shot Blocked 6.2% 3.4%
Offensive Rebound 28.5% 26.3%