NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring BING LAS
Points 68.8 75.7
Total Points   144.5
Points From 2-Pointers 40.1 37.6
Points From 3-Pointers 15.2 25.2
Points From Free Throws 13.5 12.9
Shooting BING LAS
Field Goals Made 25.1 27.2
Field Goals Attempted 58.1 61.4
Field Goal % 43.2% 44.3%
2 Pointers Made 20.1 18.8
2 Pointers Attempted 42.4 38.3
2 Point Shooting % 47.3% 49.0%
3 Pointers Made 5.1 8.4
3 Pointers Attempted 15.7 23.1
3 Point Shooting % 32.3% 36.3%
Free Throws Made 13.5 12.9
Free Throws Attempted 20.4 18.0
Free Throw % 66.4% 71.6%
Ball Control BING LAS
Rebounds 38.3 35.1
Rebounds - Defensive 28.5 26.7
Rebounds - Offensive 9.8 8.4
Turnovers 10.0 6.8
Blocked Shots 3.3 4.7
Steals 3.2 5.8
Fouls 14.4 15.3

Playing Style Advantage: Binghamton

Expected Effect: +0.3 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats BING LAS
Total Possessions 70.2
Effective Scoring Chances 70.0 71.8
% of Possessions with BING LAS
2 Point Attempt 51.8% 48.0%
3 Point Attempt 19.1% 28.9%
Player Fouled 21.9% 20.6%
Turnover 14.2% 9.7%
Opponent Steal 8.3% 4.5%
Odds Per Shot Taken BING LAS
Shot Blocked 7.7% 5.8%
Offensive Rebound 26.9% 22.7%