NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring BING NJIT
Points 72.6 68.9
Total Points   141.5
Points From 2-Pointers 40.4 31.8
Points From 3-Pointers 16.1 22.0
Points From Free Throws 16.1 15.2
Shooting BING NJIT
Field Goals Made 25.6 23.2
Field Goals Attempted 54.9 59.4
Field Goal % 46.6% 39.1%
2 Pointers Made 20.2 15.9
2 Pointers Attempted 37.5 35.8
2 Point Shooting % 53.9% 44.3%
3 Pointers Made 5.4 7.3
3 Pointers Attempted 17.4 23.5
3 Point Shooting % 30.9% 31.2%
Free Throws Made 16.1 15.2
Free Throws Attempted 24.2 21.1
Free Throw % 66.4% 72.1%
Ball Control BING NJIT
Rebounds 39.7 33.4
Rebounds - Defensive 29.7 23.8
Rebounds - Offensive 10.0 9.6
Turnovers 10.6 7.7
Blocked Shots 3.2 4.3
Steals 3.8 6.3
Fouls 14.4 17.7

Playing Style Advantage: Binghamton

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats BING NJIT
Total Possessions 69.9
Effective Scoring Chances 69.3 71.8
% of Possessions with BING NJIT
2 Point Attempt 45.9% 44.4%
3 Point Attempt 21.3% 29.1%
Player Fouled 25.4% 20.7%
Turnover 15.2% 11.0%
Opponent Steal 9.0% 5.4%
Odds Per Shot Taken BING NJIT
Shot Blocked 7.4% 5.9%
Offensive Rebound 29.6% 24.4%