NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring UVM BING
Points 72.8 62.0
Total Points   134.8
Points From 2-Pointers 31.8 35.4
Points From 3-Pointers 26.4 15.3
Points From Free Throws 14.6 11.3
Shooting UVM BING
Field Goals Made 24.7 22.8
Field Goals Attempted 55.8 57.0
Field Goal % 44.2% 40.0%
2 Pointers Made 15.9 17.7
2 Pointers Attempted 30.9 39.3
2 Point Shooting % 51.3% 45.0%
3 Pointers Made 8.8 5.1
3 Pointers Attempted 24.9 17.7
3 Point Shooting % 35.4% 28.8%
Free Throws Made 14.6 11.3
Free Throws Attempted 20.3 17.0
Free Throw % 71.9% 66.4%
Ball Control UVM BING
Rebounds 34.8 36.2
Rebounds - Defensive 28.4 27.8
Rebounds - Offensive 6.3 8.4
Turnovers 6.9 9.7
Blocked Shots 5.3 3.6
Steals 5.4 3.5
Fouls 13.7 15.5

Playing Style Advantage: Binghamton

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats UVM BING
Total Possessions 67.8
Effective Scoring Chances 67.3 66.5
% of Possessions with UVM BING
2 Point Attempt 40.9% 50.2%
3 Point Attempt 32.9% 22.6%
Player Fouled 22.9% 20.2%
Turnover 10.1% 14.3%
Opponent Steal 5.1% 8.0%
Odds Per Shot Taken UVM BING
Shot Blocked 6.5% 9.6%
Offensive Rebound 18.6% 22.8%