NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring KENT WRST
Points 82.3 84.2
Total Points   166.5
Points From 2-Pointers 38.6 48.7
Points From 3-Pointers 29.5 19.6
Points From Free Throws 14.2 15.9
Shooting KENT WRST
Field Goals Made 29.1 30.9
Field Goals Attempted 61.2 57.6
Field Goal % 47.6% 53.6%
2 Pointers Made 19.3 24.4
2 Pointers Attempted 36.6 40.7
2 Point Shooting % 52.7% 59.9%
3 Pointers Made 9.8 6.5
3 Pointers Attempted 24.6 16.9
3 Point Shooting % 40.0% 38.6%
Free Throws Made 14.2 15.9
Free Throws Attempted 19.4 21.0
Free Throw % 73.1% 75.6%
Ball Control KENT WRST
Rebounds 31.9 32.8
Rebounds - Defensive 21.4 24.6
Rebounds - Offensive 10.5 8.2
Turnovers 10.6 11.4
Blocked Shots 2.5 2.1
Steals 6.5 5.6
Fouls 17.0 14.6

Playing Style Advantage: Wright St

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats KENT WRST
Total Possessions 73.7
Effective Scoring Chances 73.6 70.5
% of Possessions with KENT WRST
2 Point Attempt 43.1% 49.1%
3 Point Attempt 28.9% 20.4%
Player Fouled 19.8% 23.0%
Turnover 14.4% 15.4%
Opponent Steal 7.5% 8.9%
Odds Per Shot Taken KENT WRST
Shot Blocked 3.7% 4.1%
Offensive Rebound 29.9% 27.7%