NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring KENT TOWS
Points 65.2 67.5
Total Points   132.7
Points From 2-Pointers 28.8 34.8
Points From 3-Pointers 23.0 18.7
Points From Free Throws 13.4 14.1
Shooting KENT TOWS
Field Goals Made 22.1 23.6
Field Goals Attempted 55.0 55.2
Field Goal % 40.1% 42.8%
2 Pointers Made 14.4 17.4
2 Pointers Attempted 33.5 35.6
2 Point Shooting % 42.9% 48.9%
3 Pointers Made 7.7 6.2
3 Pointers Attempted 21.4 19.6
3 Point Shooting % 35.8% 31.8%
Free Throws Made 13.4 14.1
Free Throws Attempted 18.3 21.2
Free Throw % 73.1% 66.3%
Ball Control KENT TOWS
Rebounds 30.7 40.2
Rebounds - Defensive 21.4 26.0
Rebounds - Offensive 9.3 14.2
Turnovers 10.0 11.5
Blocked Shots 2.8 4.0
Steals 5.6 5.4
Fouls 14.5 15.7

Playing Style Advantage: Kent St

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats KENT TOWS
Total Possessions 66.6
Effective Scoring Chances 65.9 69.3
% of Possessions with KENT TOWS
2 Point Attempt 43.3% 43.4%
3 Point Attempt 27.7% 24.0%
Player Fouled 23.5% 21.7%
Turnover 15.0% 17.2%
Opponent Steal 8.1% 8.5%
Odds Per Shot Taken KENT TOWS
Shot Blocked 7.4% 5.2%
Offensive Rebound 26.3% 39.8%