NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring SYR GTWN
Points 84.8 74.4
Total Points   159.3
Points From 2-Pointers 47.7 33.8
Points From 3-Pointers 20.3 27.8
Points From Free Throws 16.8 12.8
Shooting SYR GTWN
Field Goals Made 30.6 26.2
Field Goals Attempted 55.5 59.5
Field Goal % 55.2% 44.0%
2 Pointers Made 23.9 16.9
2 Pointers Attempted 37.6 34.7
2 Point Shooting % 63.5% 48.7%
3 Pointers Made 6.8 9.3
3 Pointers Attempted 17.9 24.8
3 Point Shooting % 37.9% 37.3%
Free Throws Made 16.8 12.8
Free Throws Attempted 23.0 17.8
Free Throw % 72.8% 72.0%
Ball Control SYR GTWN
Rebounds 29.9 34.4
Rebounds - Defensive 22.9 21.4
Rebounds - Offensive 7.0 13.0
Turnovers 9.4 13.3
Blocked Shots 3.9 2.6
Steals 9.5 4.7
Fouls 13.7 15.7

Playing Style Advantage: Georgetown

Expected Effect: +0.2 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats SYR GTWN
Total Possessions 71.6
Effective Scoring Chances 69.2 71.3
% of Possessions with SYR GTWN
2 Point Attempt 47.2% 40.3%
3 Point Attempt 22.5% 28.8%
Player Fouled 21.9% 19.1%
Turnover 13.2% 18.6%
Opponent Steal 6.6% 13.2%
Odds Per Shot Taken SYR GTWN
Shot Blocked 4.5% 7.2%
Offensive Rebound 24.7% 36.2%