NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring TEM ECU
Points 68.9 69.9
Total Points   138.8
Points From 2-Pointers 29.3 35.8
Points From 3-Pointers 26.2 19.3
Points From Free Throws 13.5 14.8
Shooting TEM ECU
Field Goals Made 23.4 24.3
Field Goals Attempted 57.5 56.0
Field Goal % 40.7% 43.4%
2 Pointers Made 14.6 17.9
2 Pointers Attempted 30.0 34.9
2 Point Shooting % 48.7% 51.2%
3 Pointers Made 8.7 6.4
3 Pointers Attempted 27.4 21.1
3 Point Shooting % 31.9% 30.5%
Free Throws Made 13.5 14.8
Free Throws Attempted 19.2 21.6
Free Throw % 70.1% 68.6%
Ball Control TEM ECU
Rebounds 35.1 37.6
Rebounds - Defensive 25.2 27.3
Rebounds - Offensive 9.9 10.3
Turnovers 9.5 9.7
Blocked Shots 2.8 2.9
Steals 6.1 6.2
Fouls 14.3 13.7

Playing Style Advantage: Temple

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats TEM ECU
Total Possessions 68.8
Effective Scoring Chances 69.2 69.3
% of Possessions with TEM ECU
2 Point Attempt 37.6% 43.5%
3 Point Attempt 34.3% 26.3%
Player Fouled 19.9% 20.8%
Turnover 13.8% 14.2%
Opponent Steal 9.0% 8.8%
Odds Per Shot Taken TEM ECU
Shot Blocked 5.3% 4.9%
Offensive Rebound 26.6% 28.9%