NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring HALL URI
Points 84.1 67.2
Total Points   151.3
Points From 2-Pointers 45.6 33.9
Points From 3-Pointers 22.3 21.6
Points From Free Throws 16.2 11.7
Shooting HALL URI
Field Goals Made 30.2 24.2
Field Goals Attempted 61.7 58.0
Field Goal % 49.0% 41.6%
2 Pointers Made 22.8 16.9
2 Pointers Attempted 40.7 35.9
2 Point Shooting % 56.0% 47.3%
3 Pointers Made 7.4 7.2
3 Pointers Attempted 20.9 22.1
3 Point Shooting % 35.5% 32.6%
Free Throws Made 16.2 11.7
Free Throws Attempted 20.0 17.7
Free Throw % 80.8% 66.1%
Ball Control HALL URI
Rebounds 38.9 30.9
Rebounds - Defensive 27.3 21.8
Rebounds - Offensive 11.6 9.1
Turnovers 8.5 12.2
Blocked Shots 7.3 3.2
Steals 7.3 4.7
Fouls 14.6 15.0

Playing Style Advantage: Seton Hall

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats HALL URI
Total Possessions 70.8
Effective Scoring Chances 73.9 67.7
% of Possessions with HALL URI
2 Point Attempt 48.7% 43.3%
3 Point Attempt 25.0% 26.7%
Player Fouled 21.2% 20.7%
Turnover 12.0% 17.2%
Opponent Steal 6.7% 10.3%
Odds Per Shot Taken HALL URI
Shot Blocked 5.7% 12.0%
Offensive Rebound 34.8% 25.0%