NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring RUTG HALL
Points 61.8 69.0
Total Points   130.8
Points From 2-Pointers 33.1 33.4
Points From 3-Pointers 17.8 19.9
Points From Free Throws 10.9 15.7
Shooting RUTG HALL
Field Goals Made 22.5 23.3
Field Goals Attempted 62.1 56.8
Field Goal % 36.2% 41.1%
2 Pointers Made 16.5 16.7
2 Pointers Attempted 40.2 36.8
2 Point Shooting % 41.1% 45.4%
3 Pointers Made 5.9 6.6
3 Pointers Attempted 21.9 20.0
3 Point Shooting % 27.0% 33.2%
Free Throws Made 10.9 15.7
Free Throws Attempted 16.2 19.4
Free Throw % 67.7% 80.8%
Ball Control RUTG HALL
Rebounds 34.1 42.4
Rebounds - Defensive 22.6 30.2
Rebounds - Offensive 11.6 12.2
Turnovers 10.8 14.2
Blocked Shots 6.5 5.8
Steals 8.0 7.0
Fouls 13.7 13.4

Playing Style Advantage: Seton Hall

Expected Effect: +0.2 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats RUTG HALL
Total Possessions 70.7
Effective Scoring Chances 71.5 68.7
% of Possessions with RUTG HALL
2 Point Attempt 47.5% 43.0%
3 Point Attempt 25.9% 23.4%
Player Fouled 19.0% 19.3%
Turnover 15.2% 20.1%
Opponent Steal 9.9% 11.3%
Odds Per Shot Taken RUTG HALL
Shot Blocked 10.6% 10.8%
Offensive Rebound 27.7% 35.1%