NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CLEM BC
Points 76.0 68.9
Total Points   144.8
Points From 2-Pointers 37.2 31.5
Points From 3-Pointers 25.4 25.6
Points From Free Throws 13.5 11.8
Shooting CLEM BC
Field Goals Made 27.0 24.3
Field Goals Attempted 58.4 59.8
Field Goal % 46.3% 40.6%
2 Pointers Made 18.6 15.8
2 Pointers Attempted 34.6 34.5
2 Point Shooting % 53.7% 45.7%
3 Pointers Made 8.5 8.5
3 Pointers Attempted 23.8 25.3
3 Point Shooting % 35.5% 33.7%
Free Throws Made 13.5 11.8
Free Throws Attempted 17.3 15.8
Free Throw % 77.8% 74.4%
Ball Control CLEM BC
Rebounds 37.7 33.2
Rebounds - Defensive 29.3 25.1
Rebounds - Offensive 8.3 8.1
Turnovers 8.2 7.9
Blocked Shots 3.2 2.2
Steals 4.2 4.8
Fouls 13.4 14.0

Playing Style Advantage: Clemson

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CLEM BC
Total Possessions 68.8
Effective Scoring Chances 68.9 69.0
% of Possessions with CLEM BC
2 Point Attempt 44.4% 44.1%
3 Point Attempt 30.5% 32.4%
Player Fouled 20.4% 19.4%
Turnover 11.9% 11.5%
Opponent Steal 7.0% 6.1%
Odds Per Shot Taken CLEM BC
Shot Blocked 3.8% 5.6%
Offensive Rebound 24.9% 21.6%