NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CLEM SYR
Points 79.7 70.5
Total Points   150.1
Points From 2-Pointers 41.2 34.4
Points From 3-Pointers 26.1 21.0
Points From Free Throws 12.4 15.1
Shooting CLEM SYR
Field Goals Made 29.3 24.2
Field Goals Attempted 60.0 57.8
Field Goal % 48.8% 41.8%
2 Pointers Made 20.6 17.2
2 Pointers Attempted 36.7 36.8
2 Point Shooting % 56.1% 46.8%
3 Pointers Made 8.7 7.0
3 Pointers Attempted 23.3 21.0
3 Point Shooting % 37.4% 33.3%
Free Throws Made 12.4 15.1
Free Throws Attempted 15.9 20.8
Free Throw % 77.8% 72.8%
Ball Control CLEM SYR
Rebounds 39.2 30.0
Rebounds - Defensive 29.7 23.1
Rebounds - Offensive 9.5 6.9
Turnovers 11.2 8.8
Blocked Shots 3.1 2.5
Steals 4.3 7.4
Fouls 14.5 13.2

Playing Style Advantage: Clemson

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CLEM SYR
Total Possessions 71.8
Effective Scoring Chances 70.1 69.9
% of Possessions with CLEM SYR
2 Point Attempt 44.6% 46.0%
3 Point Attempt 28.3% 26.3%
Player Fouled 18.5% 20.2%
Turnover 15.5% 12.3%
Opponent Steal 10.2% 6.0%
Odds Per Shot Taken CLEM SYR
Shot Blocked 4.3% 5.2%
Offensive Rebound 29.1% 18.9%