NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring MEM HALL
Points 73.5 79.6
Total Points   153.1
Points From 2-Pointers 35.6 38.8
Points From 3-Pointers 25.1 25.5
Points From Free Throws 12.8 15.3
Shooting MEM HALL
Field Goals Made 26.2 27.9
Field Goals Attempted 62.5 62.0
Field Goal % 41.9% 45.0%
2 Pointers Made 17.8 19.4
2 Pointers Attempted 36.4 37.9
2 Point Shooting % 48.9% 51.1%
3 Pointers Made 8.4 8.5
3 Pointers Attempted 26.0 24.0
3 Point Shooting % 32.1% 35.4%
Free Throws Made 12.8 15.3
Free Throws Attempted 17.6 18.9
Free Throw % 72.7% 80.8%
Ball Control MEM HALL
Rebounds 33.4 40.4
Rebounds - Defensive 21.8 26.7
Rebounds - Offensive 11.6 13.7
Turnovers 12.1 13.1
Blocked Shots 5.1 6.1
Steals 8.5 6.9
Fouls 14.7 14.4

Playing Style Advantage: Seton Hall

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats MEM HALL
Total Possessions 73.4
Effective Scoring Chances 72.8 74.0
% of Possessions with MEM HALL
2 Point Attempt 41.7% 42.6%
3 Point Attempt 29.8% 26.9%
Player Fouled 19.7% 20.0%
Turnover 16.5% 17.9%
Opponent Steal 9.5% 11.6%
Odds Per Shot Taken MEM HALL
Shot Blocked 10.0% 8.4%
Offensive Rebound 30.2% 38.6%