NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring TOWS CLEM
Points 59.2 72.5
Total Points   131.7
Points From 2-Pointers 27.3 34.9
Points From 3-Pointers 19.0 22.6
Points From Free Throws 13.0 15.0
Shooting TOWS CLEM
Field Goals Made 20.0 25.0
Field Goals Attempted 57.0 54.2
Field Goal % 35.0% 46.2%
2 Pointers Made 13.6 17.5
2 Pointers Attempted 35.2 33.6
2 Point Shooting % 38.8% 52.0%
3 Pointers Made 6.3 7.5
3 Pointers Attempted 21.8 20.6
3 Point Shooting % 29.0% 36.6%
Free Throws Made 13.0 15.0
Free Throws Attempted 19.5 19.2
Free Throw % 66.3% 77.8%
Ball Control TOWS CLEM
Rebounds 36.2 35.7
Rebounds - Defensive 23.8 28.1
Rebounds - Offensive 12.4 7.6
Turnovers 9.6 8.3
Blocked Shots 2.7 3.8
Steals 4.8 4.5
Fouls 15.5 12.9

Playing Style Advantage: Clemson

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats TOWS CLEM
Total Possessions 66.3
Effective Scoring Chances 69.1 65.6
% of Possessions with TOWS CLEM
2 Point Attempt 43.9% 44.8%
3 Point Attempt 27.2% 27.5%
Player Fouled 19.5% 23.4%
Turnover 14.4% 12.5%
Opponent Steal 6.7% 7.3%
Odds Per Shot Taken TOWS CLEM
Shot Blocked 7.1% 4.8%
Offensive Rebound 30.6% 24.2%