NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring DETU KENT
Points 66.1 79.7
Total Points   145.8
Points From 2-Pointers 35.5 38.2
Points From 3-Pointers 17.2 27.0
Points From Free Throws 13.4 14.5
Shooting DETU KENT
Field Goals Made 23.5 28.1
Field Goals Attempted 53.8 58.4
Field Goal % 43.7% 48.1%
2 Pointers Made 17.8 19.1
2 Pointers Attempted 33.2 34.9
2 Point Shooting % 53.5% 54.6%
3 Pointers Made 5.7 9.0
3 Pointers Attempted 20.6 23.5
3 Point Shooting % 27.9% 38.4%
Free Throws Made 13.4 14.5
Free Throws Attempted 18.1 19.8
Free Throw % 74.1% 73.1%
Ball Control DETU KENT
Rebounds 29.2 37.1
Rebounds - Defensive 21.2 24.9
Rebounds - Offensive 8.0 12.2
Turnovers 12.7 10.7
Blocked Shots 2.0 2.5
Steals 6.2 5.4
Fouls 15.9 15.7

Playing Style Advantage: Kent St

Expected Effect: Less than 0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats DETU KENT
Total Possessions 69.9
Effective Scoring Chances 65.2 71.4
% of Possessions with DETU KENT
2 Point Attempt 42.1% 42.2%
3 Point Attempt 26.1% 28.3%
Player Fouled 22.4% 22.8%
Turnover 18.2% 15.3%
Opponent Steal 7.8% 8.9%
Odds Per Shot Taken DETU KENT
Shot Blocked 4.4% 3.8%
Offensive Rebound 24.4% 36.5%