NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CSF UTECH
Points 70.3 67.4
Total Points   137.7
Points From 2-Pointers 32.2 32.4
Points From 3-Pointers 19.3 19.6
Points From Free Throws 18.8 15.4
Shooting CSF UTECH
Field Goals Made 22.5 22.7
Field Goals Attempted 52.4 52.3
Field Goal % 43.0% 43.5%
2 Pointers Made 16.1 16.2
2 Pointers Attempted 33.0 31.6
2 Point Shooting % 48.7% 51.3%
3 Pointers Made 6.4 6.5
3 Pointers Attempted 19.3 20.7
3 Point Shooting % 33.3% 31.5%
Free Throws Made 18.8 15.4
Free Throws Attempted 26.4 24.4
Free Throw % 71.1% 63.3%
Ball Control CSF UTECH
Rebounds 33.9 35.0
Rebounds - Defensive 25.6 25.8
Rebounds - Offensive 8.4 9.2
Turnovers 12.0 13.7
Blocked Shots 3.3 3.3
Steals 7.7 5.6
Fouls 18.3 19.0

Playing Style Advantage: CS Fullerton

Expected Effect: +0.1 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CSF UTECH
Total Possessions 72.0
Effective Scoring Chances 68.4 67.5
% of Possessions with CSF UTECH
2 Point Attempt 40.4% 38.3%
3 Point Attempt 23.7% 25.1%
Player Fouled 26.4% 25.4%
Turnover 16.6% 19.0%
Opponent Steal 7.8% 10.7%
Odds Per Shot Taken CSF UTECH
Shot Blocked 6.4% 6.4%
Offensive Rebound 24.5% 26.4%