NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CLEVST KENT
Points 72.5 73.2
Total Points   145.7
Points From 2-Pointers 42.3 34.4
Points From 3-Pointers 17.7 22.5
Points From Free Throws 12.5 16.2
Shooting CLEVST KENT
Field Goals Made 27.0 24.7
Field Goals Attempted 60.6 57.0
Field Goal % 44.6% 43.4%
2 Pointers Made 21.1 17.2
2 Pointers Attempted 41.3 33.6
2 Point Shooting % 51.2% 51.2%
3 Pointers Made 5.9 7.5
3 Pointers Attempted 19.3 23.3
3 Point Shooting % 30.5% 32.2%
Free Throws Made 12.5 16.2
Free Throws Attempted 19.0 22.2
Free Throw % 65.8% 73.1%
Ball Control CLEVST KENT
Rebounds 35.5 37.2
Rebounds - Defensive 23.6 25.5
Rebounds - Offensive 11.9 11.8
Turnovers 9.4 11.2
Blocked Shots 3.7 2.4
Steals 6.7 4.6
Fouls 16.5 14.6

Playing Style Advantage: Cleveland St

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CLEVST KENT
Total Possessions 70.2
Effective Scoring Chances 72.7 70.8
% of Possessions with CLEVST KENT
2 Point Attempt 49.8% 40.3%
3 Point Attempt 23.3% 28.0%
Player Fouled 20.8% 23.5%
Turnover 13.3% 15.9%
Opponent Steal 6.5% 9.5%
Odds Per Shot Taken CLEVST KENT
Shot Blocked 4.3% 6.1%
Offensive Rebound 31.8% 33.3%