NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring CLEVST WIGB
Points 73.0 69.2
Total Points   142.2
Points From 2-Pointers 44.5 31.1
Points From 3-Pointers 15.3 24.1
Points From Free Throws 13.2 13.9
Shooting CLEVST WIGB
Field Goals Made 27.3 23.6
Field Goals Attempted 59.9 54.0
Field Goal % 45.7% 43.7%
2 Pointers Made 22.2 15.6
2 Pointers Attempted 42.2 27.5
2 Point Shooting % 52.7% 56.5%
3 Pointers Made 5.1 8.0
3 Pointers Attempted 17.7 26.5
3 Point Shooting % 28.8% 30.4%
Free Throws Made 13.2 13.9
Free Throws Attempted 20.1 19.5
Free Throw % 65.8% 71.5%
Ball Control CLEVST WIGB
Rebounds 35.4 34.3
Rebounds - Defensive 24.3 25.5
Rebounds - Offensive 11.1 8.8
Turnovers 7.0 11.6
Blocked Shots 5.3 1.7
Steals 6.7 3.1
Fouls 15.8 14.8

Playing Style Advantage: Cleveland St

Expected Effect: +0.7 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats CLEVST WIGB
Total Possessions 68.2
Effective Scoring Chances 72.3 65.4
% of Possessions with CLEVST WIGB
2 Point Attempt 52.7% 34.8%
3 Point Attempt 22.1% 33.5%
Player Fouled 21.8% 23.1%
Turnover 10.2% 17.0%
Opponent Steal 4.6% 9.8%
Odds Per Shot Taken CLEVST WIGB
Shot Blocked 3.2% 8.9%
Offensive Rebound 30.3% 26.6%