NOTE: This model has not been backtested for historical accuracy. We publish it in large part to give an idea of stylistic trends that can be expected (fast/slow, one team dominating the boards and the other shooting a lot of threes, etc).

Box Score Projection

Scoring UNH BING
Points 74.9 74.3
Total Points   149.3
Points From 2-Pointers 33.1 46.0
Points From 3-Pointers 26.0 16.4
Points From Free Throws 15.8 11.9
Shooting UNH BING
Field Goals Made 25.2 28.5
Field Goals Attempted 59.5 58.9
Field Goal % 42.4% 48.4%
2 Pointers Made 16.6 23.0
2 Pointers Attempted 33.3 39.3
2 Point Shooting % 49.7% 58.6%
3 Pointers Made 8.7 5.5
3 Pointers Attempted 26.1 19.6
3 Point Shooting % 33.1% 27.9%
Free Throws Made 15.8 11.9
Free Throws Attempted 20.8 17.9
Free Throw % 76.0% 66.4%
Ball Control UNH BING
Rebounds 32.3 38.2
Rebounds - Defensive 25.4 29.7
Rebounds - Offensive 6.9 8.4
Turnovers 9.0 11.7
Blocked Shots 2.5 4.0
Steals 6.5 5.0
Fouls 14.2 15.9

Playing Style Advantage: Binghamton

Expected Effect: +0.4 points
Our simulation model uses tempo-free statistics to project a detailed box score for this game. This analysis also indicates which team (if any) is expected to gain a relative advantage based on the specific matchup of paces and playing styles.

NOTE: Our simulation model assumes a neutral court setting.

Tempo-Free Projection

Possession Stats UNH BING
Total Possessions 73.3
Effective Scoring Chances 71.3 70.0
% of Possessions with UNH BING
2 Point Attempt 40.7% 47.5%
3 Point Attempt 31.9% 23.7%
Player Fouled 21.6% 19.4%
Turnover 12.2% 15.9%
Opponent Steal 6.8% 8.9%
Odds Per Shot Taken UNH BING
Shot Blocked 6.9% 4.2%
Offensive Rebound 18.9% 24.9%